Additionally, the Portuguese Authorities are said to be considering re-opening their investigations.
HOWEVER, given the predilection of the McCann’s, their PR ‘persona-non-grata’ Clarence Mitchell, together with their friends, lackeys and supporters for INSISTING that any investigation is to concentrate SOLELY on the factors that THEY want concentrating on; PLUS of course, the PJ’s inability to be anything other than the “bungling Porto plod”; I thought it important that the investigators should be reminded and refreshed regarding the CHIEF SUSPECT whom they should be seeking.
By way of guidance to this suspect, I feel it only fair and appropriate to “concentrate”, solely on the ONLY witness whom Team McCann and the British Media elect to believe and trust.
Jane Tanner.
So then, attention all bulletins:-
We are seeking a
MALE
Height:5' 10" (25 May 2007)/5' 8" or 5' 9" (05 June 2007)/5' 7" to 5' 11" (09 June 2007)/5' 8" to 5' 10" (26 October 2007)/5' 9" (28 October 2007)/5' 6" (16 November 2007)/“Probably 5ft 8in tall, he was taller than me but not 6ft and so between those two” (19 November 2007)
Age:
35-40
Hair:
Hair that was short on top (25 May 2007)/Dark hair, parted to one side, slightly longer at the back (05 June 2007)/Dark hair (26 October 2007)/Black hair (28 October 2007)/
“ the one thing that I remember a lot is the hair. He did seem to have quite a lot of dark, reasonably-long-to-the-neck hair' (19 November 2007)
MALE
Height:5' 10" (25 May 2007)/5' 8" or 5' 9" (05 June 2007)/5' 7" to 5' 11" (09 June 2007)/5' 8" to 5' 10" (26 October 2007)/5' 9" (28 October 2007)/5' 6" (16 November 2007)/“Probably 5ft 8in tall, he was taller than me but not 6ft and so between those two” (19 November 2007)
Age:
35-40
Hair:
Hair that was short on top (25 May 2007)/Dark hair, parted to one side, slightly longer at the back (05 June 2007)/Dark hair (26 October 2007)/Black hair (28 October 2007)/
“ the one thing that I remember a lot is the hair. He did seem to have quite a lot of dark, reasonably-long-to-the-neck hair' (19 November 2007)
Skin:
White (25 May 2007)/Caucasian (09 June 2007)/Caucasian with southernEuropean/Mediterranean appearance (26 October 2007)/
“More local or Mediterranean looking'/'swarthy skin” (19 November 2007)
Top clothes:
Dark jacket (25 May 2007)/Dark jacket, slightly longer than a suit jacket (05 June 2007)/Wearing a maroon shirt (28 October 2007)/Heavy dark coat (19 November 2007)
Trousers:
Beige or golden long trousers (25 May 2007)/Light coloured trousers which may have been beige or mustard coloured (05 June 2007)/Camel-coloured trousers (28 October 2007)/
“He was wearing quite a lot of clothes and that's one thing in hindsight again I think was quite odd because tourists when they're abroad, Brits abroad would always have cropped trousers or shorts or something, and he had a sort of a big heavy jacket and trousers on” (19 November 2007)/
White (25 May 2007)/Caucasian (09 June 2007)/Caucasian with southernEuropean/Mediterranean appearance (26 October 2007)/
“More local or Mediterranean looking'/'swarthy skin” (19 November 2007)
Top clothes:
Dark jacket (25 May 2007)/Dark jacket, slightly longer than a suit jacket (05 June 2007)/Wearing a maroon shirt (28 October 2007)/Heavy dark coat (19 November 2007)
Trousers:
Beige or golden long trousers (25 May 2007)/Light coloured trousers which may have been beige or mustard coloured (05 June 2007)/Camel-coloured trousers (28 October 2007)/
“He was wearing quite a lot of clothes and that's one thing in hindsight again I think was quite odd because tourists when they're abroad, Brits abroad would always have cropped trousers or shorts or something, and he had a sort of a big heavy jacket and trousers on” (19 November 2007)/
“He was dressed in that sort of smart casual way European people dress” (19 November 2007)Build:
Medium (25 May 2007)/Slim (26 October 2007)
Shoes:
Dark shoes (25 May 2007)/Black or brown shoes (28 October 2007)
Original Description:
“The man was carrying a bundle, possibly blankets or clothes”
Child's description:
“I could tell it was a child, and I could see the feet and the bottom of the pyjamas, and I just thought that child's not got any shoes on because you could see the feet.” (19 November 2007)
Child's clothes:
“the pyjamas had a pinky aspect to them so you presume a girl.”
Got that? All Clear?
“The man was carrying a bundle, possibly blankets or clothes”
Child's description:
“I could tell it was a child, and I could see the feet and the bottom of the pyjamas, and I just thought that child's not got any shoes on because you could see the feet.” (19 November 2007)
Child's clothes:
“the pyjamas had a pinky aspect to them so you presume a girl.”
Got that? All Clear?
Now let's FIND him.
And leave no stone unturned......................
Brilliant. Let us not forget what McCann family said in the first hours: Gerry called in a panic on the phone and told them (Philomena for example, his sister) that the windows had been SMASHED, and the shutters DAMAGED... as reported to the press on 5th May 2007, we did keep all the articles. Even Mr Robin CROSSLAND from the OC at Warners, Pdl, said that it was an utter lie, to the same press... yesss, then weren't we all expecting a trial already?
ReplyDeleteBut no, trial NEVER came, not about facts & evidence anyway, not about Madeleine... Therefore I DO think that Portugal lets time go by so that the McCanns and the press and many others can make more and more PROFIT, it's insane.
Because a trial WILL bring out the evidence, WILL get the case un-archived, WILL bring the beginning of the truth. A Trial of the McCanns and friends would be the normal thing to do if anyone in the Portuguese authorities WOULD care of Children, as they are SUPPOSED to.
Mag
I hope your not suggesting jane tanner is telling lie,s.:-))
ReplyDeleteA bundle blankets/clothes that suddenly got feet? Sorry, left no stone unturned, couldn't find it.
ReplyDeleteStrange how the fog quickly clears when all the conflicting descriptions are collected together in one place. Jane Tanner, the McCann couple's only witness...dear oh deary me!
ReplyDeleteNicely done :)
To be honest, there were OTHER, ridiculous descrepencies in Tanner's statement. Her 'abductor' started out as 'egg-man', as that was the only feauture that she could recal, that he had a very oval face. He quickly metamorphosised into 'bundleman', but without very much detail as it was clearly DARK at the time of the sighting. However, Jane was eventually able to remember that the bundle was, in fact, a GIRL wearing identical pyjamas to Madeleine. I honestly don't know how Clarence kept a straight face.
ReplyDeleteI do wonder about those pyjamas Spudgun. I cannot recall a time when I have bought identical sets, although I'm sure some parents probably have.
ReplyDeleteBut it's the red top which puzzles me. Why would the cadaver dog indicate the red t-shirt? If Madeleine had died in apartment 5a, is it possible that she was wearing her day clothes and not her pyjamas?
(From PJ files) Questioned, (Tanner) she stated probably being able to identify the person that she saw if she saw him in profile and at the place where she saw him.
ReplyDeleteClicky
Source Halfway down the page.
From Kate McCanns statement taken after Jane had been interviewed earlier in the morning. Gerry McCann sitting behind Kate as she gave her statement said.
ReplyDeleteSnippet from Kates statement
Later, a member of the group, Russell's partner Jane, when she went to her apartment to see her children at around 9.15pm, saw from the back [rear] about 50 metres away, on the perimeter road of the club, a long-haired person, in what she thinks were jeans, with a child in his arms and walking very quickly. But she is better able to tell you about that herself.
Jane Tanner in her rog. saying she did not take jeans on holiday with her...she was not asked if she had jeans with her but Jane wished for some reason to get this fact across.
ReplyDeleteKate mentioning the jeans on May 4th. A pair of jeans seem to be of importance in this case, possibly they are inside the missing blue bag.