Follow by Email

Total Pageviews

Wednesday, 15 February 2012

McCanns issue NEW Wanted Suspect Photos based on TANNERS original Descriptions


At a PRESS conference today, Clarence Mitchell, spokesman for Kate and Gerry McCann, issued a number of new Identikit photographs of individuals that Detectives working for the McCanns would like to interview.

Said Mr. Mithchell,
"Someone out there knows something. Someone must have seen something. I appreciate that there has been a lot of confusion surrounding Jane Tanners testimony and descriptions relating to the abductor that she saw leaving the area of my clients apartment, carrying what she and we believe to be Madeleine McCann."

Original description of abductor, as provided by Jane Tanner


Mr. Mitchell continued:
"Given that there has been some critism leveled at Mr. and Mrs.McCann, as well as Ms.Tanner, regarding what some people have scurillously and unhelpfully suggested has been a constant change in the descriptions and appearances of this individual, it has been suggested that we concentrate our areas of investigation purely based on the information as was initially provided and recorded.

If you think you recognise any of the following individuals, please contact our specially prepared hotlines where, as well as awaiting to take details and locations of your sightings of Madeleine, they can provide a whole list of convicted or suspected paedophiles, living OR dead, who may prove to be suitable candidates and matches for your queries"

Mr. Mitchell concluded:-
"Equally importantly,they are able to accept Credit and Debit card donations in order to continue our search for Madeleine. If you do NOT have such cards, we can facilitate the acceptance of Postal Orders, cheques, bank drafts, pension books, piggy banks and cash in any denominantion or currency

Accordingly, we would very much like to know the wherabouts of the following persons:-



























92 comments:

  1. lolol these are brilliant - is the last one Buster Bloodvessel?

    love to have seen the policeman's face when he first saw that sketch 'er, thank you Ms Tanner, that's really, er, useful' :D

    ReplyDelete
  2. Jane Tanner

    Never a better time than to leave this with you Spud it is an excellent piece by Paulo Reis that even a layman could understand.

    I did a copy and paste in case one day it disappeared ,things do tend to disappear in this case !

    Love your work. xx

    http://thetapas9janetanner.blogspot.com/2012/02/jane-tanner-and-framing-of-robert-murat.html

    ReplyDelete
  3. brilliant,shame Tanners a proven liar

    ReplyDelete
  4. Love it, Spudgun! I'll look out for that person/those people when I'm out and about today. Before or after I see the doctor? Maybe before, just in case I spot any of them and the doctor can help me!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Sickening.

    Whatever the involvement of the McCanns, using it as an excuse for schoolboy humor is inexcusable. You are a disgrace.

    Distasteful in the extreme and full of hatred for Madeleine.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sending you goodwill.
      And not taking your opinion on board.
      There is nothing disgusting about this other than the British government, the British press ad people like you who value the parents protection more than the rights of a child who is missing.

      Delete
    2. It is disgusting to the average person to make jokes about a very serious case whatever the cause- murder or abduction.

      People who discuss possibilities are engaging in adult discussion, even if at the edge of the law (see Tony Bennett's current problems.)

      But people who use it as an excuse for humour are amongst the lowest of the low.

      Delete
  6. Well done Spudgun!

    It would be easy to get the culprit to confess.
    Line those guys up in a row.
    Tap them all on the head with a spoon.
    And see who cracks first.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I know that man, I saw him sitting on a wall in a fairy tale.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Well done - actually this chap has been around for quite awhile - John Lennon knew him!

    ReplyDelete
  9. LOL Spud. That is so funny. Its as good as Kates bewk lol. Kathie 20

    ReplyDelete
  10. Quote: "AnonymousFeb 16, 2012 04:56 AM
    Sickening.

    Whatever the involvement of the McCanns, using it as an excuse for schoolboy humor is inexcusable. You are a disgrace.

    Distasteful in the extreme and full of hatred for Madeleine."

    I think the sickening part is that Kate and Gerry never searched for Madeleine on the night - what do they know? I think its sickening that Kate refused to answer police questions. I think its sickening that they refused to do a reconstruction. I think its sickening that they are still free, ruining other peoples lives and collecting the cash on the way. That is what is sickening. Cashing in on your "missing" daughter is sickening and distasteful in the extreme.

    The humour here is welcome, and it does come from the witness statements.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Whether or not the McCann's behaviour is sickening, using the death/disappearance/abduction of a small child as a cause of mirth casts you into a deep level of social hell. It is no wonder that the press avoids getting involved when they see this sort of ghoulish behaviour by nomarks like Spudgun the posters who cannot see the morally questionable attitude of this attempt at humour and who support him in it.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Perhaps if people want humour about Madeleine, perhaps they should look elsewhere on the net:

    What's the difference between Pope John Paul II and Madeleine McCann? The Pope died a virgin.

    Why did the McCanns visit the Pope- if anyone can find a paedophiles, he can.

    What is wrong with McCann Oven chips- they disappear from the oven after being left there for 20 minutes.

    And for the fifth year running, winner of the World Hide and Seek contest- Madeleine McCann.

    Soak up the humour- it is no worse than the OP!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous, those jokes are sick and there is no comparison to the humour Spudgun has
      shown.

      it is not to the detriment of Madeleine,
      more to the detriment of Tanner, Mitchell,
      Edgar, and the McCanns who continue to peddle these ridiculous drawings of suspects.

      Delete
    2. It is despicable to find humour in the death/disappearance of a small girl. If you cannot see that you have obviously had a moral compass bypass.

      Delete
  13. Gerry McCann certainly found plenty of humor in it when photographed on his daughter's 4th birthday.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That does not excuse the reprehensible moral lapse here.

      Didn't your mother ever tell you that two wrongs do not make a right.

      What a pile of excrement post here.

      Delete
    2. That includes you.

      Delete
    3. And what do you mean by that, or was it just a drive-by?

      Delete
  14. Clearly Anonymous was so outraged by all these "jokes" that they just had to repeat them for the benefit of the rest of us, who have not seen them before. Who is being disrespectful to Maddie now?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. WWho is being disrespectful to Maddie- people who posted those jokes and people who support this thread. Uncaring ghouls all.

      Delete
  15. Oh, yes. Humor at the disappearance of Madeleine. It is a new level of lowness.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9VlS-gO5Ask

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Look up the difference between mood and humour. Making jokes about the case for personal gratification makes you look like the ghouls that you are.

      As I said above, it is no wonder that the general press- not even Private Eye, will give you the time of day- you are even lower vermin than Millie Dowler's phone hackers.

      Delete
  16. The unvarnished truth about your idols must really hurt, and all you can do is make ad hominem attacks in return. I think it is clear to any passing visitors, who are the real ghouls and vermn.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No where and no way do I support the McCanns; that is your rather stupid assumption. II support Madeleine nd the Twins and foul humour shown on this page shows a lack of respect for them.

      Do try to see the world in full colour rather than in simplistic Black and White.

      If you had any care for Madeleine and her memory, you too would condemn childish humour such as this post by Spudgun.

      Bt f you support makin merry about the death/disappearance of a small girls, then that is your moral choice. And you will be judged by that choice.

      Delete
    2. you write with the voice of green ink.

      Delete
    3. Green Ink is normally reserved for people who follow a cause beyond the rational.

      I will leave the ordinary reader (if there are any for this site) to decide whether obsession with a criminal case for five years requires green ink, or a few days of criticism having discovered the ghoulish antics on twitter do.

      I suspect that the reasonable person would see the various pro and anti ghoul; sites as requiring the Green Ink!

      Delete
  17. Anonymous, no one is 'makin merry about the death/disappearance of a small girls,' simply the whole range of suspects the parents have thrown up for the public to help them search for. I don't see any photos of children here or even get a hint of anyone insulting a child. If you weren't so blinkered, you might be able to see who is being derided here. It's not a child. It's those adults who would have us believe that a swarthy, tall, short, spotty, clear-skinned, short-haired, long-haired, man, woman, man and woman, abducted a child. Someone who insults me is not insulting my children. Likewise here: mocking certain adults is not mocking anyone's child.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If a child of yours was abducted and there had been a few people of interest to talk to, despite them looking different would you,
      a) Release non of the e fits
      b) Release only one, which one?
      c) Release them all that seem credible?

      If I had children and/or grandchildren I could certainly tell you what my answer would be.

      Delete
    2. If a child of yours was abducted and there had been a few people of interest to talk to, despite them looking different would you,
      a) Release non of the e fits
      b) Release only one, which one?
      c) Release them all that seem credible?

      If I had children and/or grandchildren I could certainly tell you what my answer would be.

      Delete
    3. If I was in that position I would want two things- for the police and legal authorities to concentrate on the subject as much as they could (which seems to have been done) and for stupid ghouls with no connection with the case to fuck off and leave me alone.

      Your hobby is an insult to humanity.

      Delete
    4. @AnnaEsse. I have just linked you to one of the Madeleine Ghoul sites. You seem to be ghoul in chief.

      What a load of sad, silly and bored people you must keep there. It all seems to be either a big joke or an excuse to pretend you are Poirot, or more likely Clouseau.

      Collectively you are a waste of bandwidth and in real life probably a waste of valuable oxygen.

      Getting your jollies by being silly with a serious case.

      Delete
  18. Well said AnnaEsse.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Any attempt to have fun on the back of the disappearance of a small girls is morally reprehensible. The fact that you cannot see this demonstrates how morally impaired you are. Ghouls on both sides of the issue have spent years getting their jollies by playing detective with a very sad case; neither side comes out of it with any honour.

    All I can say is that if you cannot see how childish humour like the above reflects on the author and on the hoi polloi who are supporting this, then you are simply missing a working moral compass.

    Your choice if you wish to be seen as a ghoul by reasonable moral people.

    ReplyDelete
  20. I can assure you that I am very far from stupid and simplistic. And I do not have to rely on flinging insults at other readers to make my point.

    I do not see Spudgun make any fun of Madeleine. What I do see him make fun of the ridiculous stories that the parents expect us to believe. And if the parents expect to insult our intelligences like this, then they must expect some payback.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It is stupid and simplistic to assume, as you did, that I must be Pro-McCann when all I am is pro Madeleine. I have made no comment in favour of the McCann parents- that was your false assumption.

      If you act in a stupid and simplistic manner it is fair enough for me to assume that you are stupid and simplistic.

      Delete
  21. Ad hominem proven, I believe. What more is there to say. Any criticism of the McCanns and their cohort seems to get this. By the way, your use of plurals is giving you away somewhat!

    ReplyDelete
  22. I rest my case.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I was not aware that you had actually made any case.

      Delete
  23. I think you misunderstand ad hominem. I am criticising specific behaviour apparent in posts- that is not ad hominem. Your last comment is interesting- I wonder what interesting (and probably incorrect) smear you will come up with.

    Back to the topic- making humour or amusement about this case shows low moral standards.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Abandoning three babies, for five nights running, to go with friends to the pub. Is this an example of high moral standards?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree that is not a high moral standard.We are not discussing that.

      Nor is making merry or otherwise exploiting for personal satisfaction a tragedy of this nature. We are discussing that.

      Delete
  25. I thought we were making fun of other peoples lack of moral standards. Especially when they then start telling us that everybody does it and it is responsible parenting, when anybody with any moral standards knows damn fine that its not.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The irresponsibility of the parents is beyond question as is the pettiness and stupidity of those making the discussion into their hobby and demonstrating that they have limited contact with any form of valued pastimes other than ghoulish and bizarre discussions on the internet.

      Delete
  26. You appear to be part of this ghoulish and bizarre discussion, Anonymous. And after all that, would you show me where anyone here has insulted a child?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The entire Madeleine McCann 'hobby' - both sides- is an insult to her memory.

      I came here from Twitter where I was appalled by the lack of moral compass shown by people who have made this their ghoulish hobby.

      Shame on you all.

      Delete
  27. @Ananymous. You have spent most of the last two days making this discussion YOUR hobby, and demonstrating that YOU have limited contact with any form of valued pastimes other than ghoulish and bizarre discussions on the internet. Who is being petty and stupid now?

    BTW AnnaEsse is right. Nobody here has insulted a child. Refusing to co-operate with the police who are trying to find her is a much bigger insult, and making up bizarre and fantastic stories of phantom abductors is REALLY insulting a child. Maybe you should be saving your righteous indignation for those who really deserve it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Better two days insulting ghouls than five years insulting Madeleine's memory.

      All you are doing is engaging in mutual emotional masturbation.

      What a group of low lifes.

      Delete
  28. Ae you just plain thick, or just determined to deliberately misunderstand it? Nobody here is insulting Madeleine's memory. And if you think this is masturbation (funny that you should use that word) then that makes you a dogger. Nice.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. All I am saying is that I have found a group of sad, rather stupid harpies who get their jollies by discussing an old case and see that as a moral way to spend their lives.

      Wankers literally and metaphorically.

      Delete
  29. Spudgun - the reason this upsets so many people is that it does make a mockery - a mockery of one of the few flimsy planks in the abduction theory - JT's witness account(s) It strikes a cord with those believers so deep they have to resort to swearing! Great result!!! Keep up the good work all you nutters!!

    ReplyDelete
  30. The reason it upsets people with some moral fibre is that it is a group of silly mean-spirited people fighting over the bones of Madeleine McCann shouting Abduction/Accidental Killing/Murder/Neglect/walked and wandered etc like a group of silly nursery pupils arguing over a rag doll.

    Sickening behaviour for a group of adults.

    Grow up and find a real hobby rather than being a McCann Ghoul.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Typical stupid comment:

    "Spudgun has done more for Maddie than her own parents ever did."

    So some internet nutter with a cause has done more for Madeleine than her parents did?

    It is hyperbole like this that makes the ghouls look stupid.

    ReplyDelete
  32. @annaesse You say:

    "Most of them work to the same script and you can predict the vocabulary: nutters; haters; ghouls; scums (sic) pitch forkers (sic) insulting Madeleine; hating Madeleine."

    Has it dawned on you that those are the reactions of the ordinary moral majority who do not have an obsession with the McCann Case.

    Go and read David Icke on the Lizards controlling the world- it has about the same truth value as most of the stupid speculation on all the pro and anti Madeleine sites.

    People use those words because your obsession is seen by rational moral people as equivalent to Icke's beliefs about Lizards. But at least he is not attacking a family by doing his tossing off.

    ReplyDelete
  33. If Mr/Mrs Anonymous thinks I'm a ghoul for disbelieving the fairy tale abduction theory... just what are his opinions of the parents? After all Madeleine did disappear while they were responsible for her care and they even admitted publicly to abandoning both her and her siblings.

    So what about it Mr Anonymous... what do you think of them?

    ReplyDelete
  34. @annaesse 10678 posts on the corpse of a poor dead girl. What a ghoul you must be.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Who said Madeleine was dead? And what does my post count elsewhere have to do with Spudgun's post and the fact that no one here has insulted a child?

      Delete
  35. OMg...We're talking about lizards now...... you're getting a tad off topic.... doncha think, Mr Anonymous?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Lizards versus ghouls, I'll take the Lizards as they are not actively trying to hurt any particular individual, whereas the McCann Sites are full of bile for the McCanns, Amaral, Bennet, the Tapas 7.

      Sad lonely despicable people.

      Delete
  36. At Anonymous two above. I think the parents were wildly reckless leaving children alone in a room.

    That was an event that occurred through a stupid miscalculation.

    Sites that dig up children's graves everyday however are a continuous, sad and ghoulish daily event that has been going on for five years.

    I think I can forgive a stupid error over childcare (even with a tragic result) more easily than I can forgive people who creep back to the cess pits of McCann Obsession on a daily basis.

    Does it never cross you mind why so few people post on the site and how much of a tiny majority Madeleine obsessives are? There are probably more members of the flat earth society!

    ReplyDelete
  37. @Malenastool (or shittyblood to give you your name in English- there's and insult to Madeleine in itself)

    I found MissingMadeleine by googling and it is an open site. No, I am not a member, and no you are not Sherlock Holmes.

    ReplyDelete
  38. Anonymous, why do you keep bringing sexual terms into it? Masturbation, tossing off. Do you really think that this is respectful to Madeleine?

    ReplyDelete
  39. No, but it is appropriate to the group of frustrated old women who obsess about a dead child just because their lives are so empty.

    ReplyDelete
  40. Errr, I am not a woman, I am not old, I am not frustrated, my life certainly is not empty and there is no proof whatsoever that Madeleine is dead, or has even come to any harm. Gerry McCann keeps telling us so.

    ReplyDelete
  41. Take stupid old women as a category rather than a description. Stupid is a stupid does, and Madeleine obsession is stupid.

    Of course there is a small possibility that she is alive, but few missing children are recovered after five years.

    The moral thing is to keep your mouths shut and leave the real work to people paid for it. As it is you just look like the cast of Murder incorporated- 5 immature people and a dog.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You do come across in writing as a bit of a bitch.

      Delete
  42. I have now read some of the threads on MissingMadeleine.

    It reminds me of the Stepford Wives in its commitment to independent thought. A group of people who cannot cope with complicated arguments or any difference of opinion.

    So sad.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You should try, "Revenge of the Stepford Wives." It's brilliant!

      Delete
  43. Don't the anonymous ppl here know any other words apart from jollies and ghouls? I don't believe they are all louise mensch.

    ReplyDelete
  44. The Truth has only one version and one day the truth will out - if the McCann parents know the are innocent - why should they worry? And why do people feel they have to post to defend them? Save your energy and sit back, relax and watch it all unravel in the fullness of time if that's what you wish. Others do as Sir Gerald of Rothley asked and leave no stone unturned in our search for our Madeleine. Like it or not, that's what we do.

    ReplyDelete
  45. @Tanszi- i beieve that Madeleine is likely to be dead because the vast majority of missing children are dead or located within weeks or months of their disappearance. It seems that anti-McCanns wish her dead to support their theories ans pro-McCanns want her to be alive to suit theirs.

    Now this is difficult for you to understand- I don't take sides, I just despise people who are still obsessing over this issue years after it should have died a death itself. People who spend months posting about it are sad deluded people with no real life.

    ReplyDelete
  46. Then why are you here obsessing over it? Don't you have a real life? Or are you too busy making up theories about what you think other people are thinking, and posting insults? What right have you to say Tanzi doesn't understand something just because he/she doesn't agree with you?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I was so offended by what I saw on Twitter that I decided to let people know how ghoulish they seem.

      I was just pointing out that believing that Madeleine fanatics are just a little bit lacking in real life experience, common sense and a moral compass does not mean that one supports the McCanns.

      Delete
  47. Well, I guess we are all looking for that missing piece of the puzzle. Yes, Kate and Gerry, be careful what you wish for.

    ReplyDelete
  48. Yes AnneEsse, if Madeleine turned up alive after being abducted, it would mean that you had wasted the last five years being so, so wrong. Hence most of you overtly or covertly wish Madeleine dead- a living Madeleine would spoil your fun.

    ReplyDelete
  49. So now our Anonymous is a mind reader as well as a dogger?

    ReplyDelete
  50. Better accused of being a dogger than actually being a ghoul.

    ReplyDelete
  51. @annaesse= but you have to admit that the sudden appearance of an abducted Madeleine would piss on your chips- all those 'theories' out of the window.

    A live Madeleine would make the antis look like fools as well as ghouls.

    ReplyDelete
  52. My God, you're like toddlers that have discovered the "poo" word. Can't you say anything other than "ghouls ghouls ghouls" like demented parrots. FFS change the record.

    ReplyDelete
  53. If it looks like a duck and walks like a duck....

    ReplyDelete
  54. Come on people, back to real life, looking into little girls eyes. Mummy and daddy are busy with their own real life, selling lies. Just a hint to the missing piece of the puzzle:

    "If I'm honest, we haven't put too much emphasis on her eye because I think you have to be very close to her to see it, but her eyes are slightly different colours and one of them has a brown fleck in it...emm...but you do notice particularly on photographs, but..." - Kate McCann

    Good luck!

    Spudgun and AnneEsse, thanks for the information on your blogs.

    ReplyDelete
  55. I have asked Paulo Reis to translate the words on Ms Jane Tanner's drawing that shows her * on a journey that does not make sense. Because I have searched there and actively with the locals from 30 days after she was 'missed' from the holiday flat of 5A I can say it was a very painful thing to share with all of the town. When a person who is vulnerable is found or reported missing just like Shannon Matthews the issue is where is she? In this case the child was a pawn for the media as the rewards offered became a fixation.

    There has never been a way to say someone is alive and know it for sure, and that is medical fact, unless you have a live body. There is no way that you can say a paedophile will let his victim live or can live. Although Elizabeth Smart at 14 as a bride fitted the desires of the man as woman and slave.

    A child that is seen on a tennis court playing is not a baby, nor a toddler, nor the cutsey little doll that peers out of a book at you. Then 'bang' you are lulled as then it takes on in the story the same detail as in a forensic psychology treatment session as details so alarming of sexual penetration is described fully by the mother as a fear. That illusion of Madeleine and her life is lost as I then saw as she did only death. I could not and cannot come to terms with that.

    In a treatment session described by the practioners of his clients narratives as academic yes, but not in a coffee table book I had sought to find comfort in and to know her life up till she was to be four in days.

    I feel cheated and yet I still go to Praia Da Luz quietly to search, not in a supermarket, but the same as in all missing children cases. Factually I will not find her aged nearing 9 soon as I would not know how her captors had dressed her in the modern world. Nor would they show her.

    But the point is by coming here to explain is that I am not on the 'tug of war' of any side. Like most the years have had their toll and we cannot make things right that we spurt out to media.


    The Fund as a company could have bought a memorial for James Bulger, could have provided the 2 million pounds to search again on Wessenden Head for the body of Keith Bennett. Could have.

    But did not. Nothing good has come of this as many have found a way to print money.

    In the end I still search as others do for where one could hide a body as no one has seen her since that day to this. It is a normal path that the family of John Kilbride took with thousands of others to find him perhaps trapped, and perhaps drowned. Searching by looking in social environments is not going to find who took her, and who will be charged eventually for this crime.

    Whatever crime that is? Till then the person who hid her has much to fear. It is called fear of exposure of that crime, whatever crime that is.

    ReplyDelete
  56. There is a troll that feels she can say that this is a baby missing. The magic is in the pantomime. A face that stares at you like a competition for Farley's Rusks. But then all infants grow up, but the best ones are on the fireplace. The baby sells advertising and the dog sells toilet rolls. In the end none are real. The baby has grown up and so has the puppy. But images sell as good marketing ploys as neither the dog or the infant is real. Both are time lapsed identities.

    ReplyDelete
  57. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P8_apbj2zbk&feature=share

    ReplyDelete
  58. GreenInk; umad bro?

    ReplyDelete
  59. For someone taking the moral high ground annonymouse is a very rude troll.

    As for the photo fit - thats whan most folk knew somthing was well wrong with this "tory"

    poor child - poor poor child.

    ReplyDelete
  60. In what way shape or form is joking about a child abduction funny? I hope something terrible happens to anyone who jokes about it and i also hope they are laughed at for it.

    ReplyDelete