Follow by Email

Total Pageviews

Wednesday, 27 July 2011

Madeleine McCann- AMAZON changes its mind on CENSORSHIP

Pat Brown is a renowned and well known American Criminal profiler who, amongst other tasks, offers pro bono profiling and training for Law enforcement agencies. 

Amongst her many publications, a few weeks back, she launched 'The Profile of the Disappearance of Madeleine McCann'.

This was, effectively, an accurate analysis of all the evidence available in the case, freely available within the public domain, combined with her own theories regarding what might have happened to Madeleine, based on her professional experience and expertise.

The publication, available in KINDLE format and available on AMAZON, was a great success.

Up until yesterday.

For that is when Amazon removed the publication from sale from its websites. 

There is NO official explanation, thus far, from Amazon regarding its actions. In response to emails sent by customers, querying the publications removal, it states:-

“Occasionally books are removed from the Kindle Store for various reasons. We don't have any details about why this particular book may have been removed. Thank you for your interest in Kindle.”

However, in an interview on an American online radio broadcast with Levi Page, Pat states that she was informed by Amazon that they had received a-

 “notice of defamation from Carter-Ruck solicitors claiming that the book contains defamatory statements regarding their clients Kate and Gerry McCann”

In an attempt to clarify this rather bizarre turn of events I spoke to Amazon’s Press Office, (UK), where a nice lady called Laura Bonny promised that she would look into the matter, subject to receipt of an official Media e-mail request.

I forwarded, the following-

"I am seeking to ascertain the reasons for the cessation of the selling of the 'Kindle' Book, by Pat Brown, ‘The Profile of the Disappearance of Madeleine McCann’.

My understanding is that this publication was on sale on all Amazon outlets for several weeks. Can you please confirm for me whether its removal from sale from your sites was as the result of LEGAL actions undertaken and are you in a position to confirm for me who undertook such actions?

Can you also confirm for me whether or not the publication in question has been the subject of any complaints relating to its title or its contents?

Can you confirm whether Amazon has been contacted by either Kate or Gerry McCann, or by individuals or organisations acting on their behalf in relation to the publication or its contents?"

30 hours later, with no response, I spoke with their Press Office again, this time another nice young lady called Sophie who explained that she WAS aware of the furore surrounding the title, but that they, (Amazon UK), were awaiting notification and directions from their AMERICAN Head Office, regarding statements, but that she assured me she WOULD respond to my questions in time.

Of course, irrespective of what Amazon says or does NOT say regarding its removal of a title on the instructions of the McCanns or their representatives, WITHOUT the  benefit of any actual LEGAL hearing or proven ACTION, I shall be reminding them of ANOTHER, rather more vociferous statement issued by Amazon in recent times:-

"Amazon believes it is CENSORSHIP not to sell certain books simply because we or others believe their message is objectionable............. we do support the right of every individual to make their own purchasing decisions."

This astonishing stance was issued in defence of Amazon’s INSISTENCE on allowing the sale on its websites of a rather unpleasant publication titled ‘The Pedophile’s Guide to Love and Pleasure’, subtitled ‘A Child-Lover's Code of Conduct’.

That publication WAS eventually removed after a HUGE storm of protest and condemnation, much of it from children’s charities.

It remains to be seen whether Pat Brown is successful in re-instating her publication, or whether she joins the INCREASINGLY long list of people silenced/sued/threatened/sanctioned as a result of the McCanns and their overwhelmingly exorbitant Lawyers, whose never ending fees must SURELY be greater than the Millions amassed through public donations and other fund-raising ventures.

As for AMAZON itself, however, (the multinational electronic commerce company”),  it poses a rather more disturbing predicament. 

One where it is apparently happy to sell material CLEARLY and unequivocally relating to the sexual abuse of children, and the purported PLEASURE that such an activity entails, whilst at the same time censoring a publication that LEGITIMATELY calls into question the ‘OFFICIAL’ version of events relating to the disappearance of a 3 year old girl, as alleged and insisted upon by Kate and Gerry McCann, their never ending entourage of supporters, backers, PR Moguls and Newspaper editors, and their powerful lawyers.

As Abbott Joseph Liebling once said:-

Freedom of the press is guaranteed only to those who own one. 

Godbless Madeleine McCann, wherever you may be.


  1. Ive had a reply from Amazon ,they told me it was removed for "legal reasons"

  2. I hope the truth comes out very soon indeed.... you have to have a good memory to be a lair! I hope Pat brown succeeds in getting her book reinstated..


    For me a light has been switched on. Bully boy Murdoch and his massive connections with Amazon Kindle. The fact Murdoch also has a Papal Knighthood which is how the McCanns met with the Pope. A Knighthood, those in power wish to see him stripped of sooner rather than later.

  4. This is the same Scenario that the McCanns used
    to silence Amaral, but the Supreme Court overturned
    the injunction saying his book did not stray from
    the PJ"s assessment on what happened to Madeleine.

    I think Amazon U.S.A. will overturn the ban because
    Pat Brown was interviewed via phone in to a Radio
    Station which is bound to create publicity.

  5. At least a thousand or more Americans, who never had an opinion about the McCanns smell something fishy now.

    Good job Kate and Gerry, nobody of us could have achieved that so eaasily!

  6. I too recieved an email from Amazon in reply to my email,they said it was removed for legal reasons.

  7. again ppl jump to conclusions when one employs a lawyer they are the main driving force in banning books etc. and keeping a very special eye on certain ppl. CR are a very good company and have excellent lawyers.Also us Americans have our own view of Miss P.Brown.

  8. us Americans?

  9. rather a rude reply but as I posted us Americans me being American many of us follow this tragic case and feel strongly for The McCanns not against them.

  10. I received this reply from Amazon after emailing them as to why they removed Pat Brown's book. Fortunately I had already purchased it.

    Please accept my sincere apologies for the inconvenience caused.

    From your email, I understand that you would like to know the reason why this title "A profile of the disappearance of Madeleine McCann" by Pat Brown has been removed from our website.

    We are currently aware of this issue and are waiting for further information. As soon as we have this information, I will update you accordingly. Please expect a further update within 2 business days. Please be aware that this is the maximum amount of time it will take for us to update you.

    Thank you for your patience and for bringing this matter to our attention.

    Did I solve your problem?

  11. Thank God "us americans" have little authority anymore when it comes down to truth and justice.

    A nation governed by Fox News can hardly be taken serious

  12. anonymous above not a good posting Regarding nation and Fox News I think you need to be careful what you post on any forum.

  13. 'us americans' seems like a McCarthy babe.
    censor, forbid, ban and stop.

  14. Unfortunately "us americans" have like minded people living in GREAT BRITAIN,but "our day" is fast approaching,especially now our discredited policeforce will have to tell it as it is,NOT as they were "advised" when accepting their little thank you gifts in brown envelopes!!!

  15. Anyone who questions the McCanns is censored. It seems that those in authority are so corrupt they are even willing to turn a blind eye to this childs fate no matter how implausible the 'abduction' story is. I no longer have any faith in our institutions and believe the Scotland Yard review will be just another whitewash.
    Todays Daily Express devoted it's front page to the, already proven, hoax sighting in India whilst relegating the Sara Payne hacking scandal to a small corner - disgraceful journalism. It isn't just News International who fabricate and manipulate stories.

  16. I wonder when (apart from this India alleged sighting) has there been any plausible leads given either to Team McCann or any police force.

    Just one

    And considering the hype ....particularly on the promotion of the book, which was equally to raise money and GIVE AWARENESS & HOPED FOR NEW LEADS
    when did anyone actually receive a piece of information that had anything to do with the case

    emmmmm let me think, there was Jane Tanner's sighting, the Smith family sighting, and Mr Smith's subsequent observation about the man carrying a child.

  17. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.